CREG Committee - minutes of meetings
Posted: Sat 17 Sep 2022 10:43
Minutes of a CREG Committee Meeting --- 26th August 2021 [sic] (via Zoom)
Apologies for the late publication of these minutes - the meeting was over a year ago. Another meeting is planned for the near future
In attendance:
For some time, CREG affairs have been determined informally by email and phone calls between MB, DG and RG. It was thought that there may be advantages to holding more formal committee meetings, as and when required, and that this more open approach would make it easier for others to get involved.
2 Overseas subscription rate
The EU removal of Low Value Consignment Relief was resulting in the imposition of VAT and additional handling charges for postage of the Journal from the UK to EU. It had been noted that some other, non-EU, countries were also in the process of following suit. DG stated that the situation was complicated and in a state of flux, but the minimum likely additional cost could be addressed by raising the standard overseas annual subscription to £27.00.
It was regretted that this increase might cause some subscribers to not renew, but every effort would be made to encourage them to switch to a £4.00 electronic subscription. If new arrangements made posting of Journals unreliable or subject to further charges, affected subscribers would be offered a transfer of remaining credit to an electronic subscription. It was agreed that the change would be made with immediate effect and the Journal and web pages amended to reflect this.
Note: DG has posted more detailed notes on this situation on the CREG forum at http://bcra.org.uk/cregf and updates will appear there also.
ACTION: RG DG
3 Co-options to the committee
To best reflect the interests of the group, the committee would consider co-opting additional committee members. It was considered important that any co-opted committee members had an active track record. RG had identified one such candidate and they would be invited to join subsequent meetings.
ACTION: RG
4 Journal editor
RG had indicated a wish to stand down as Journal editor. Initial indications were that there is no obvious successor. The production of the CREG journal is a team effort with considerable input from others. It was agreed that RG would document the editorial role, as currently performed, to determine whether some tasks could potentially be redistributed, making the role easier to fill. In the meantime, we would continue to consider suitable volunteer(s).
5 Scope of CREG and Journal
For some time, CREG had been open to broadening its coverage to include all form of cave-related technology, in the absence of other journals regularly publishing in those areas. We often featured articles on photographic and surveying topics, and would be open to aspects of mechanical engineering and other areas. DG suggested that to give context to our surveying coverage, we should cover some of the fundamentals of surveying. DG would approach one or more established cave surveyors with a view to commissioning such material.
ACTION: DG
6 Social media
RG felt that some of the content of the CREG web page required refreshing and that we should seek a volunteer with demonstrable skills. DG considered that this was only part of a wider picture and that CREG's overall social media presence should be considered. As an example, BCRA had an active Facebook presence, though this required significant effort to maintain.
ACTION: This topic would be a matter for future discussion.
7 AGM
Because CREG, since 2007, has been managed as a sub-committee of BCRA Council, rather than a constituted group, it has no formal requirement to hold an annual general meeting. However, a meeting would bring potential benefits in terms of wider group involvement. We would consider holding an AGM at some point in the future, possibly in association with some other BCRA or BCA event.
8 Field meetings
The covid-19 pandemic was making it difficult to organise a field meeting and it was probable that the next meeting would have to be in a different format to mitigate risks. Currently, the earliest likely date for a field meeting is Spring 2022. It would be useful to discuss likely formats with regular attendees.
ACTION: RG would initiate wider discussion via email and the CREG forum.
9 AOB
DG had recently introduced voting buttons on the CREG Journal web pages so that we could gain an understanding of reader preferences. This was only attracting a few votes, probably because voting necessitates a return to the web page after the download and reading of the articles concerned. Over time it was hoped that this would provide useful feedback.
Update: Since that report, the voting buttons have been withdrawn as it was clear that they were not providing any useful data.
10 Publication of minutes
It was agreed that, once approved, minutes of committee meetings would be published on the CREG Forum.
ACTION: RG
11 Next meeting
Further meetings would be called when required.
Apologies for the late publication of these minutes - the meeting was over a year ago. Another meeting is planned for the near future
In attendance:
- Mike Bedford – Chairman
- David Gibson – Treasurer
- Rob Gill – Secretary
For some time, CREG affairs have been determined informally by email and phone calls between MB, DG and RG. It was thought that there may be advantages to holding more formal committee meetings, as and when required, and that this more open approach would make it easier for others to get involved.
2 Overseas subscription rate
The EU removal of Low Value Consignment Relief was resulting in the imposition of VAT and additional handling charges for postage of the Journal from the UK to EU. It had been noted that some other, non-EU, countries were also in the process of following suit. DG stated that the situation was complicated and in a state of flux, but the minimum likely additional cost could be addressed by raising the standard overseas annual subscription to £27.00.
It was regretted that this increase might cause some subscribers to not renew, but every effort would be made to encourage them to switch to a £4.00 electronic subscription. If new arrangements made posting of Journals unreliable or subject to further charges, affected subscribers would be offered a transfer of remaining credit to an electronic subscription. It was agreed that the change would be made with immediate effect and the Journal and web pages amended to reflect this.
Note: DG has posted more detailed notes on this situation on the CREG forum at http://bcra.org.uk/cregf and updates will appear there also.
ACTION: RG DG
3 Co-options to the committee
To best reflect the interests of the group, the committee would consider co-opting additional committee members. It was considered important that any co-opted committee members had an active track record. RG had identified one such candidate and they would be invited to join subsequent meetings.
ACTION: RG
4 Journal editor
RG had indicated a wish to stand down as Journal editor. Initial indications were that there is no obvious successor. The production of the CREG journal is a team effort with considerable input from others. It was agreed that RG would document the editorial role, as currently performed, to determine whether some tasks could potentially be redistributed, making the role easier to fill. In the meantime, we would continue to consider suitable volunteer(s).
5 Scope of CREG and Journal
For some time, CREG had been open to broadening its coverage to include all form of cave-related technology, in the absence of other journals regularly publishing in those areas. We often featured articles on photographic and surveying topics, and would be open to aspects of mechanical engineering and other areas. DG suggested that to give context to our surveying coverage, we should cover some of the fundamentals of surveying. DG would approach one or more established cave surveyors with a view to commissioning such material.
ACTION: DG
6 Social media
RG felt that some of the content of the CREG web page required refreshing and that we should seek a volunteer with demonstrable skills. DG considered that this was only part of a wider picture and that CREG's overall social media presence should be considered. As an example, BCRA had an active Facebook presence, though this required significant effort to maintain.
ACTION: This topic would be a matter for future discussion.
7 AGM
Because CREG, since 2007, has been managed as a sub-committee of BCRA Council, rather than a constituted group, it has no formal requirement to hold an annual general meeting. However, a meeting would bring potential benefits in terms of wider group involvement. We would consider holding an AGM at some point in the future, possibly in association with some other BCRA or BCA event.
8 Field meetings
The covid-19 pandemic was making it difficult to organise a field meeting and it was probable that the next meeting would have to be in a different format to mitigate risks. Currently, the earliest likely date for a field meeting is Spring 2022. It would be useful to discuss likely formats with regular attendees.
ACTION: RG would initiate wider discussion via email and the CREG forum.
9 AOB
DG had recently introduced voting buttons on the CREG Journal web pages so that we could gain an understanding of reader preferences. This was only attracting a few votes, probably because voting necessitates a return to the web page after the download and reading of the articles concerned. Over time it was hoped that this would provide useful feedback.
Update: Since that report, the voting buttons have been withdrawn as it was clear that they were not providing any useful data.
10 Publication of minutes
It was agreed that, once approved, minutes of committee meetings would be published on the CREG Forum.
ACTION: RG
11 Next meeting
Further meetings would be called when required.